Stik vs Obsidian — Quick Capture Comparison

Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base. Stik is a lightning-fast capture tool. Here's how they compare when all you need is to jot something down instantly.

FeatureStikObsidian
Time to capture a note
<3 seconds (global shortcut)
~8–10 seconds (open app → new note)
Global keyboard shortcut
⌘⇧S — works from any app
No built-in global shortcut
Note format
Plain markdown (.md) files
Plain markdown (.md) files
Local-first storage
Yes — ~/Documents/Stik/
Yes — vault on local disk
App size & resource usage
~15 MB, native Rust/Tauri
~400 MB+, Electron-based
On-device AI search
Yes — semantic search, zero cloud
No (requires paid plugins or cloud)
Open source
Yes — MIT license
No — source-available, not OSS
Price
Free
Free core, $50/yr for sync & publish
Knowledge graph & backlinks
No
Yes — graph view, backlinks, plugins
Plugin ecosystem
No
Yes — 1,500+ community plugins
Git-based sharing
Yes — share folders via git
Possible with manual git setup
Stik leads in 7 of 11 categories

The bottom line

Obsidian excels as a long-form knowledge management system with its graph view, backlinks, and extensive plugin ecosystem. If you're building a second brain or managing a personal wiki, Obsidian is a great choice.

But if your primary need is speed — capturing a fleeting thought before it disappears — Stik is purpose-built for that. No app switching, no finding the right note, no waiting for Electron to load. Just ⌘⇧S, type, done.

Stik is also fully open source (MIT), uses a fraction of the resources (native Rust vs Electron), and includes on-device AI for semantic search — no paid plugins or cloud required.

Many users run both: Stik for capture, Obsidian for organization. Since both use plain markdown files, they work together seamlessly.

Try Stik free

Download Stik and start capturing thoughts in under 3 seconds. Free, open source, no account required.

Download Stik for Mac