Stik vs Obsidian — Quick Capture Comparison
Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base. Stik is a lightning-fast capture tool. Here's how they compare when all you need is to jot something down instantly.
| Feature | Stik | Obsidian |
|---|---|---|
| Time to capture a note | <3 seconds (global shortcut) | ~8–10 seconds (open app → new note) |
| Global keyboard shortcut | ⌘⇧S — works from any app | No built-in global shortcut |
| Note format | Plain markdown (.md) files | Plain markdown (.md) files |
| Local-first storage | Yes — ~/Documents/Stik/ | Yes — vault on local disk |
| App size & resource usage | ~15 MB, native Rust/Tauri | ~400 MB+, Electron-based |
| On-device AI search | Yes — semantic search, zero cloud | No (requires paid plugins or cloud) |
| Open source | Yes — MIT license | No — source-available, not OSS |
| Price | Free | Free core, $50/yr for sync & publish |
| Knowledge graph & backlinks | No | Yes — graph view, backlinks, plugins |
| Plugin ecosystem | No | Yes — 1,500+ community plugins |
| Git-based sharing | Yes — share folders via git | Possible with manual git setup |
The bottom line
Obsidian excels as a long-form knowledge management system with its graph view, backlinks, and extensive plugin ecosystem. If you're building a second brain or managing a personal wiki, Obsidian is a great choice.
But if your primary need is speed — capturing a fleeting thought before it disappears — Stik is purpose-built for that. No app switching, no finding the right note, no waiting for Electron to load. Just ⌘⇧S, type, done.
Stik is also fully open source (MIT), uses a fraction of the resources (native Rust vs Electron), and includes on-device AI for semantic search — no paid plugins or cloud required.
Many users run both: Stik for capture, Obsidian for organization. Since both use plain markdown files, they work together seamlessly.
Try Stik free
Download Stik and start capturing thoughts in under 3 seconds. Free, open source, no account required.
Download Stik for Mac